skip navigation nih record
Vol. LXI, No. 23
November 13, 2009

previous story

next story

Book Recounts History of the Eye Institute

Dr. Carl Kupfer (l) and Ed McManus, circa 1994
Dr. Carl Kupfer (l) and Ed McManus, circa 1994

Dr. Carl Kupfer and Edward McManus have been a team since 1973—Kupfer’s third year as the first director of the National Eye Institute and McManus’s first year as NEI executive officer.

“From the beginning, Carl had the vision and I was the implementer,” remembers McManus, who later served as NEI deputy director.

So it was fitting that they reunited in 2004, 4 years after they had both retired from NEI, to document the institute’s history.

“Carl was the driving force behind the book, just like his philosophy was the driving force behind the first several decades of the NEI,” McManus says.

Kupfer and McManus contacted historian and editor Nancy Berlage for guidance in beginning the project. Berlage was tasked with merging two visions of the book—Kupfer’s desire for a narrative, documenting NEI’s philosophy and accomplishments, and McManus’s goal of a scholarly public policy paper, describing the development of a successful organization.

“As a historian, I often work from documents, which can only tell a limited story,” Berlage says. “It was very exciting for me to be able to talk to these individuals who had the institute’s collective memory in their heads.”

“Living histories,” however, present the challenge of objectivity, so the team searched for secondary sources to confirm these recollections. Gale Saunders, Kupfer’s former assistant, gathered much of this information from boxes in the National Archives that contained dusty papers: minutes from National Advisory Eye Council meetings, congressional testimony, letters describing strategies for the institute’s formation and program planning documents from after NEI’s establishment.

Kupfer and McManus also collected oral histories from people who had testified to Congress in support of an eye institute in the 1960s. “It was wonderful to be able to get insights from those who had been originally involved,” Kupfer says. “Through the interviews, we had a pretty good picture of what happened, and we were also able to tell a more interesting story.”

Kupfer remembers that the most satisfying part of the project was watching these facts and interviews emerge into a story. “It was like a giant quilt stitched together carefully over time,” he says.

The team began writing nearly 2 years ago and organized the book’s chapters by themes including, “The Intramural Research Program,” “Randomized Clinical Trials” and “National Eye Health Education Program.” The publication was recently released to coincide with NEI’s 40th anniversary.

Members of the scientific community may read it to gain insights on how a new organization was built. “Perhaps people can learn from the positive actions we took and our errors of omission,” McManus says. “They can see the problems and how one group tackled them.”

Berlage notes that the book could be particularly interesting to the recipients of vision science advances. “The general public can read this to see how science works, how it is organized and how medical procedures develop,” she says. “Most, if not all, of us will be on the receiving end of that at some point.”

But for the vision research community, the publication holds a more personal significance, according to Kupfer. “It documents many of the accomplishments of vision researchers, which helped pay back the investment that the U.S. public made when it created the NEI.”

To view a copy of History of the National Eye Institute, 1968-2000, visit NIHRecord Icon

back to top of page